An Open Letter To LOGO-TV
Dear LOGO,
It’s unfortunate that you never catered to the LGBT community in the past very well, but now you seem to have abandoned them all together, with the exception of your Drag Race fans. Your latest offering – “In The Big House” looks to be another travesty. And while you are touting this as the “real life” Modern Family, the truth is, this is anything but a bunch of straight mobsters who happen to clash with another gay stereotype. Even your “about LOGO” shows that you no longer want to cater to LGBT.
ABOUT LOGO
Logo celebrates one-of-a-kind personalities, unconventional stories and discovering what’s next-all through a mix of original and acquired entertainment that’s outrageous, smart and inclusive. Entertaining a social, savvy audience of gay trendsetters, Logo also attracts a straight audience that wants to be ahead of the curve.
Come on now LOGO, who are these social and savvy gay trendsetters you speak of? Latrice Royale fans? Please also note, I watched every season of RuPaul’s Drag Race so I’m not anti–Drag, but I’d love it if you offered some other representation.
The Gay Community understands that it is difficult to create something fresh and modern that may have a cross appeal on a limited budget, however, BRAVO seemed to figure it out just fine. Watch What Happens Live is probably the cheapest produced show I ever saw, yet it’s continuously fresh, innovative, entertaining and routinely attracts over 1 Million Viewers nightly and many of which are both straight and gay.
They know their audience and they know how to be creative in bringing in viewers.
It’s great you found 1 hit show in all these years thanks to the cross-appeal of Drag Queens, but it would be nice to show the rest of the world that you can also attract a more mainstream audience by showing a more original facet of gay culture. Perhaps showing a gay version of Real Housewives was not the answer. Perhaps the answer is finding an element in the gay community that doesn’t present us as a “Girls Just Want To Have Fun” video would be a bit more captivating.
There are a lot of lower budget ways to find an audience. LOGO should be the first network that can show the rest of the world that the gay community can be interesting without having to put on a dress or camp it up. Here are a few rough ideas
- A dating and/or cooking competition show that features all sorts of representatives from the gay community.
- A Gay Bar Rescue type of show where someone saves another poorly run Gay Bar from failing…
- A talent / variety show that features all from the LGBT community?
- The life and times of Gay Cops and Firemen.
While the concepts may not be all that original, the casting, execution and presentation of these can be.
Perhaps if one of these clicks, you’d have a budget for scripted entertainment – a sitcom that shows a more realistic version of a gay couple raising a kid, or a group of gay singles trying to find their way in the world of love. Or better yet, a Soap Opera that takes place in West Hollywood or someplace not often publicized much by the gay community, like Chicago -:).
There, now I’ve put together your 3 year blue print for success.
With many of these ideas, you could actually put together shows that encompasses LGBTQ all in one half hour! Not even the mainstream networks have accomplished that yet. (Sorry Modern Family, sorry Will & Grace)
I always thought that the Gay Community was one of the most creative groups of individuals out there, but apparently that must be another stereotype I was unaware of.
Yours Truly,
Mark
4 Comments »
Leave a Reply
-
Recent
- Meet the Contestants of Amazing Race 21
- The Salvation Army’s Practices Make Chick fil-A Seem Tame
- Boycotting Chick Fil-A – Has The Gay Community Gone Too Far?
- Meet Big Brother 14′s Token Gay – Wil Heuser
- TV Fall Preview Alert – Partners (CBS) – A First Look
- Backlash of the Gay Male Comedians
- Backlash Of The Gay Stereotypes
- An Open Letter To LOGO-TV
- Reality TV: The Aftermath We Seldom See
- LOGO TV’s New Direction
- Reality TV – Where is the LGBT Representation?
- More Shark Tank News!
-
Links
-
Archives
- August 2012 (2)
- July 2012 (4)
- June 2012 (5)
- September 2010 (2)
- August 2010 (1)
- May 2010 (2)
- April 2010 (1)
- March 2010 (2)
- February 2010 (4)
- January 2010 (6)
- December 2009 (1)
- September 2009 (1)
-
Categories
- Best of 2009
- Chick Fil-A
- TV
- Big Brother 11
- Crash
- Happy Town
- Hell's Kitchen
- Kitchen Nightmares
- LGBT
- Live For The Moment
- LOGO
- Masterchef
- More To Love
- Partners
- Past Life
- Re-Inventing Bonaduce
- Reality TV
- Romantically Challenged
- Saturday Night Live
- Sons Of Tuscon
- Summer TV Preview
- The Amazing Race 15
- The Amazing Race 16
- The Deep End
- The Good Guys
- Undercover Boss
- Uncategorized
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Calling people stereotypes. Looks like we need to get an It Gets Better video for the gay community or maybe I should commit suicide because I’m feminine so that I can be accepted by gay people. My Dad doesn’t accept me and now you don’t either… It’s not just you. It’s a disgusting movement in the gay community. NO FATS OR FEMS. Who can I turn to? You’re doing more damage than you think when you make fun of feminine gay men. Sorry I’m not as masculine as you. I was born this way.
There isn’t anywhere in the article that stated you weren’t accepted. If maybe you’d consider reading through the article again and take in the point that was being made, there is nothing in there that said effeminate gay guys like yourself (as you have labeled yourself, not me) can’t be shown on TV or should be banned from being recognized etc… One of the reasons Queer As Folk was so good is because they had a mix of everything – fem, butch and in-between. All I’m looking for LOGO to is to show some representation from all parts of our community so that people will have a better idea as to what were all about. It’s not about excluding anyone and I don’t get where your reading that in the remarks on this blog. There may be gay guys that don’t except you the way you are out there, but I’m not one of them.. my friends are as diverse as the shows I’m looking to see on LOGO and I don’t claim to be the champion of butch men (I enjoy Cher as much as the next gay). But really – the whole point is moot because LOGO looks to be turning to mostly straight shows with a touch of gay, so we all lose. Have a nice day Daniel.
For an excellent response to my commentary, please check this link out..
http://www.tvmediainsights.com/forum/?mingleforumaction=viewtopic&t=1945.0
According to Sherman, Logo’s revenues and ratings are booming since its recent realignment. Advertising income has grown by double digits every year they’ve been in business, and the second quarter of this year was its highest-rated to date. That doesn’t mean everyone’s happy. I’ve done my own share of griping about Logo’s programming. (My public complaints were mostly limited to snarky tweets about The A List: New York , the channel’s feeble attempt to produce its own version of the Real Housewives franchise. The A List’s slogan: “Housewives. With Balls.”) But online articles about Logo are inevitably accompanied by negative comments accusing it of betraying the gay community. CBS, the most successful network on broadcast television, generates a fraction of that passion. We hold family to higher standards than strangers, so while it’s easy for me to ignore the Real Housewives, I feel obliged to watch and whine when people who are playing on my team—whether it’s the A-Listers or the women of Showtime’s The Real L Word —make fools of themselves in public.